GETTING
THE MOST FROM`BLOOD LACTATE TESTING
Note: An edited version of this essay
first appeared in the Oct. 2007 issue of Triathlete Magazine.
Definition: As a by-product of
metabolism, lactic acid is produced in several tissues of the
body, including the muscles. As it diffuses out of the muscles
and other tissues, it appears in the blood as lactate. A simple
test determines the amount of lactate present in the blood
measured as millimoles per liter. The sampling procedure
involves pricking the skin, obtaining a drop of blood on a test
strip inserted in a meter. The result is calculated and
displayed 60 seconds after blood contacts the test strip. The
procedure includes safety standards to sterilize the skin sample
site, to isolate and protect the client and the administrator,
to obtain an uncontaminated sample, and for proper disposal of
testing implements.
Application: In the context of
endurance sports, blood lactate tests are conducted for two
primary reasons: 1) By determining the athlete’s lactate
threshold in correlation with perceived rate of exertion, heart
rate, speed and/or power output, zones of intensity can be
determined for effective training. 2) Through periodic testing
with consistent and controlled variables (temperature, altitude,
recovery, time of day, diet, etc.) it is possible to monitor
progress during the athlete’s training and racing seasons, by
comparing current results with past results. Both of these
applications are relevant specifically to the sport they are
tested for. In other words, a test for running will not provide
applicable data for cycling.
Procedure: In a conventional
lactate threshold test, blood samples are tested: 1) At rest,
before the athlete begins. 2) After 5 minutes at a sustained
“Easy” pace. 3) After 5 minutes at a “Moderate” pace. 4) After
5 minutes at a “Moderately Hard” pace. 5) After 5 minutes at a
“Hard” pace. 6) After 5 minutes at a “Very Hard” pace. Another
repetition at higher intensity can be added if there is no clear
evidence of a rapid increase in lactate level. The athlete
pauses between increments only long enough to obtain the blood
sample. Average heart rate for the last 15 seconds of the
5-minute period (or for the entire 5 minute period) is noted,
along with the blood lactate level. In addition, speed and
power output are recorded if available and relevant. Upon
completion of the sampling, a graph is generated. Lactate
threshold is determined to be at the onset of a rapid increase
in blood lactate.
There are
two very important factors to consider in this conventional
testing procedure. First, it is the athlete that is
determining the level of intensity for each increment. (The
quoted intensity levels I have included above come from “The
Training Intensity Handbook”, by Dr. John Hellemans, a noted
expert in the field.) Obviously these terms describe a
subjective rate of perceived exertion (RPE); hence the blood
lactate levels, heart rates, etc., are determined for
perceived rates of intensity. With a graph, it may be
determined that the athlete crossed the threshold at some point
during one of the 5 minute increments, and not precisely at the
heart rate and blood sample time. Therefore, the lactate
threshold can be estimated somewhere between the sample
increments.
Second,
there are many variables that influence the results,
beyond RPE. Some of these are listed above. One thing is
certain: These variables will change on a daily and even hourly
basis. A coach or athlete who designs and conducts a training
program solely “by the numbers”, by the heart rate, speed or
power values associated with the blood lactate samples, is
attempting to train “in the lab”, rather than the real world.
Athletes do not live in or race in the lab. On the other hand,
as a means of periodic testing to determine an athlete’s
progress through the season, the lab context is valid, assuming
that pertinent variables are held constant. Heart rate training
zones determined through blood lactate testing will vary
constantly.
For its
application in daily training, the big question is this:
How can we get the most value out of blood lactate testing?
How does testing assist us in determining training zones and
designing training programs? How does testing apply to daily
workout sessions?
Alternative Testing Protocols:
Before we address the big question, lets consider
alternative protocols. One alternative is to obtain the samples
after the athlete has sustained activity for 5 minutes at
specific heart rates, rather than at perceived rates of
exertion. If the athlete increases intensity at 5 or 10 heart
beat increments between blood samples, the threshold
determination may be more accurate. As a variation on this,
specific to cycling with a power meter, the athlete may increase
intensity based on 5- or 10-watt increments. Again, this will
provide a more accurate determination.
The
second alternative is to conduct a “Lactate Balance Point Test”
as designed by Chlebek and Feldman of FaCT Canada. (www.fact-canada.com.)
The athlete begins with 3 repetitions of 6 minutes. This is the
lactate buildup phase. The first rep is at an easy warm
up pace. The second is at a moderate pace, say a half marathon
or marathon pace. The third is at a hard pace, say a 5K pace.
(Translate these intensities to cycling or swimming.) Only
after completing all three is the first blood
lactate sample and heart rate obtained. Lactate level is now
very high.
Once the
sample is obtained the athlete will begin a series of 5-minute
intervals that comprise the lactate clearance phase. The
first interval is conducted at a heart rate 40 beats below the
finishing heart rate of the last buildup interval. At the end
of this interval, blood lactate is sampled and recorded. The
second interval is conducted with a 10-beat increase in heart
rate. Again blood lactate is sampled and recorded. For the
rest of the test the intervals will be conducted with 5-beat
increases in heart rate. When blood lactate ceases to drop and
begins to increase, the lactate balance point test is complete.
This test
closely determines the highest heart rate where the athlete
is still clearly aerobic – able to clear lactate from the blood
as lactic acid is produced in the muscles. For long course
endurance competition, this value may be more applicable than an
estimated lactate threshold. As with the conventional lactate
threshold test, this test is specific to the sport tested and
reflective of the many variables listed above that can change on
a daily and hourly basis.
Ideal World: Ideally, perhaps the
athlete should test on a daily basis to correlate heart rates
and/or power output levels with training zones for the specific
sports of that day. This would eliminate the subjective element
of perceived exertion from the training equation. However, at
$90 per complete test, the monetary expense as well as the
investment of time and energy makes this impractical, if not
absurd. Professional athletes will often test once a month
during a recovery week to ascertain progress and redefine
zones. For most age group athletes however, even monthly
testing for both biking and running is hard to justify at $180
per month. For those who are earnest about performance, testing
at the beginning of the Base Phase and again during the
transition to the Build Phase for both bike and run can provide
valuable guidance. The athlete might consider testing again
before the Peak Phase leading up to a goal race; however, if the
values do not reflect high performance levels the athlete
expected, this may be psychologically impairing.
Real Life:
As performance-oriented athletes, if we are investing a
considerable amount of time and energy in training, and a
considerable amount of money on gear, it might be wise to invest
in blood lactate profiles for both biking and running. These
can provide a “reality check” in how we correlate the “soft”
data of our subjective perceived rates of exertion with the
“hard” data of heart rate, speed and power. It can also provide
us with training guidance by revealing what zones we are strong
in and what zones we are lacking in. If you choose to invest in
a blood lactate profile, here are a few guidelines to help you
get the most value from it:
Bang for the Buck:
The most important caveat is to realize that the specific heart
rates, speeds, power values and training zones that are
determined by the blood lactate levels are not to be
regarded as absolute gospel. They will fluctuate daily.
Rather, use the test as way of standardizing your
perceived rates of exertion, as a way of fine-tuning your
discernment. When you are being tested, be very aware of
your perceptions – your breath, discomfort levels, degradations
in your pedaling or running efficiency, your cadence, the level
of burn in your muscles, tingling in your extremities – in short
all the clues that indicate your level of intensity. Do
not get lost in making this a “race performance” at the expense
of recording your observations. Create as many distinctions for
yourself between your intensity zones as you can. In fact, jot
them down, or ask the test administrator or a friend to do so as
you pause for each blood sample.
Effective training depends on the
capacity to determine appropriate frequency, duration and
intensity. Frequency and duration are strictly quantifiable
hard data. Intensity however is based on a sliding relationship
between the hard data of heart rate, power and speed, and the
soft data of perceived exertion. If the soft data slides “up”
and the hard data slides “down” then the athlete is producing a
higher relative output with less perceived effort. This
indicates adequate recovery and adaptation; the athlete is
progressing and is ready for another breakthrough workout.
Conversely, if the soft data slides down and the hard data
slides up, the athlete is producing a lower relative output with
higher perceived effort. She/he is still recovering and
adapting from previous stress and should rest patiently before
hammering again. (Keep in mind that the source of stress may be
something other than athletic, but this does not discount its
impact.)
The athlete who has clearly
standardized his/her perceptions into distinct zones of
intensity can clearly perceive how the soft and hard data
correlate moment by moment. This standardization is the
essential bridge between the “soft” data of your RPE and the
“hard” data of heart rate, power and speed. Certainly a sliding
relationship also exists between heart rate versus output (power
or speed). This sliding relationship provides valuable clues
for current athletic condition. Keep in mind however that RPE
can also slide in relation to heart rate for a specific sport.
Heart rate may be regarded as a kind of “intermediary” between
soft data perception and hard data output.
For the budget conscious athlete
willing to invest in only one such test to determine intensity
zones based on a correlation of the soft and hard data mentioned
above, choose your weakest sport – bike or run. Correlating
blood lactate with heart rates for swimming will have limited
application, unless the athlete swims by heart rate.
Correlating to swim speed at a prescribed distance will provide
more guidance, but remember that lanes in the middle of the pool
are faster than end lanes, and that choice of swim wear also
affects performance. Instead, let swim technique dictate the
intensity, frequency and duration of swim intervals. When
technique begins to diminish markedly, allow for a combination
of more recovery and less intensity. (Technique quality is
equally valuable in dictating cycling and running intensity.)
Discuss the protocols your test
administrator offers and determine what is appropriate for your
level of training. If you have a power meter on your bike,
consider testing at 5- or 10-watt increments, and correlate
heart rate, power and PRE. If you do not train with a power
meter, you must diligently correlate the blood lactate levels
with heart rate and RPE. Consider testing at 5- or 10-beat
increments. Make sure ahead of time that you are able to cycle
(or run) at constant heart rates, plus or minus 2 beats. If you
are testing for running, remember that treadmill running does
differ biomechanically from conventional road running. You may
choose to test at a running track instead, so you can still
accurately determine your pace and correlate with heart rate and
PRE. In summary, correlating blood lactate and heart rate with
bike or running speed does not provide reliable guidelines.
There are too many variables that affect speed – tires, shoes,
wind, surface, temperature, humidity, topography, etc.
Preparing:
Many test administrators will recommend specific preparations
before testing. Some of these include: Refrain from eating for
2 or 3 hours before the test. Refrain from ingesting caffeine.
Refrain from long or hard training for at least 24 hours,
allowing for adequate recovery. However, if you are testing to
define your training zones based on RPE correlated with heart
rate, it might be best to conduct the test under conditions that
closely mimic your usual training conditions for that sport. If
you usually train first thing in the morning, try to test at
that time. If you usually eat right before you train, or tank
up on caffeine, you may get more applicable results if you test
in the same condition.
There is an endless sea of
scientific data to guide us in constructing and implementing
triathlon training programs from sprint to ultra distance. The
pioneers in our sport served as the guinea pigs and lab rats.
We learn from their triumphs and their failures. However, pick
up any two triathlete magazines and you will find contrasting
and conflicting protocols for training, nutrition, bike fitting,
tapering and racing. The plethora of data and experience at our
fingertips is both a blessing and a curse. There is much we can
glean from it so we don’t have to re-invent the wheel. However,
if we conduct our training and racing solely by the numbers,
precisely the way our tri hero did it back in the golden days
with no regard to our own perceptions, then we are missing
the whole point. The quest in athletic excellence includes a
relentless pursuit to hone our own senses, perceptions and
discernment.
Blood lactate testing is an
effective procedure for periodic testing to determine if our
concocted alchemy of hard science and soft perception are
advancing us towards our goals. It is also an effective
procedure for the novice to standardize his/her perceptions in
correlation with heart rate, blood lactate levels and measurable
output. The bottom line is that we must integrate and harmonize
the hard world of numbers with the soft world of perception.
This is the “magic”: the intuition and creativity of athletic
excellence.
Enjoy it.
Shane Eversfield is author of
“Zendurance, A Spiritual Fitness Guide for Endurance Athletes”
and a Serotta certified bike fit specialist at High Peaks
Cyclery, Lake Placid.
He is available for
“Effortless Power” workshops.
www.zendurance.net